LCD display panels, casting some light on the mess

As some Tiny C2N Monitor buyers have found out, the LCD panel they received is not working as expected. Let me spend a few words here on where I believe the mess started.

Firstly, I bought all batches of red LCD panels from the same eBay seller, listed under the very same listing:

Contrary to common sense and expectations, the red LCD panels V1.1 I ordered in October 2015 and developed Tiny C2N Monitor with are incompatible with the red LCD panels the seller is shipping under the same eBay listing, now V2.1, despite the fact his listing’s pictures clearly read V1.1. Moreover, the latest red panels are different from the black panels V1.1 also often found on eBay.
In practice, I seem to have come across 3 different LCD panels all behaving differently due to the different memory addressing settings on the controller. This means they all require a different driver, especially when hardware scrolling is used, which is the case with Tiny C2N Monitor.

Community users seem to be are aware of the fact some of these LCD modules come with the wrong settings, as shown in a number of online forums, e.g.×128-TFT-driver

Quoting from the above post: “The maker of those display’s (a chinese for sure) forgot to set the hardware addressing for fix the memory map to a certain resolution (in this case 128 x 128) and leaved at 128 * 160 so this display showed big pixel addressing problems…”

I myself developed the firmware for these red LCD panels V1.1 circumventing the issue introduced by the manufacturer and have designed the hardware in a way that the LCD is oriented conveniently for users to read from it when connected to a Commodore 64.

I haven’t got the original product code for the red LCD module I developed Tiny C2N Monitor with, but it has a blue label on the LCD protection that I didn’t find elsewhere (other models have a dark green label) and reads “1.44′ SPI 128*128 V1.1” on the backside. If anybody has the product code for the red panel V1.1 with a blue label, it’d be great to know what it is.

As per other panels, I do have their product codes:

  • old red panel (memory addressing for 128*160): ??, ??, ?? – reads V1.1 on the silkscreen
  • black panel (addressing 128*128): 28021, A08D3, 1501012-819 – V1.1 on the silkscreen
  • new red panel (addressing 128*160): 28022, A08D3, 151222-819 – V2.1 on the silkscreen

The new red panel V2.1 sold under the same listing as per above is behaving in a way that is in between the behaviour of the old red and black ones: Its mapping of physical memory to the display is simply opposite to V1.1 meaning that the extra 32 rows in the erroneous mapping now have to be dealt with in a different way.

In substance, neither 28021 nor 28022 will work fine with the standard Tiny C2N Monitor firmware, although eBay sellers seem to be naively selling 28022/V2.1 under the very same listing they used to sell the old red panel V1.1 under!

I adapted my firmware to work for 28021 and 28022: I’ve found out that both 28021 and 28022 are oriented differently compared to the old red panel and need a different initialization sequence (specifically the parameter provided to the memory access control command) in order for them not to display the output upside down compared to what Tiny C2N Monitor was meant to show using the red LCD panel V1.1.
However, the firmware on Tiny C2N Monitor cannot be easily updated once in the field. Therefore getting the right LCD module to work with Tiny C2N Monitor would be the simplest route.

I’ve started an eBay case with the seller of the LCD modules I bought, in order to express my dissatisfaction with them selling incompatible LCD modules under the same listing that clearly shows V1.1 in their pictures. I shall let you know how that goes.

Red LCD panel comparison

Red LCD panel comparison (same eBay listing but ordered at different times)

At the same time I am approaching other eBay sellers asking specifically for the color of the label and version on their red LCD panels before ordering replacements for those buyers who got a kit with an incompatible panel.

This entry was posted in Retrocomputing, Technical and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to LCD display panels, casting some light on the mess

  1. max mc costa says:

    I have coded the library TFT_ILI9163C and I’m try to deal with all strain around this TFT since it’s really popular and a lot of people like it. I never heard about version 2.1 so can you send me a link where I can buy it? I will try to fix in the library.
    Recently things goes even worst, another strain appeared in the market, it has yellow pin, it’s smaller than ‘classic’ 1.1, no text around tft and of course not working as the old 1.1. Actually I’m not sure it uses the same controller since it simply ignore 2 commands in the initialization sequence, I’m start to think that uses a low cost unbranded version of the ILI chip.
    I believe to fix this strain, I hope it’s the last one, have to include a lot of mods in the upcoming library to accomodate all versions of this display.
    Seems the version on the back it’s nonsense, they just write what they want.
    Look also the design of those display, the regulator has a decoupling condenser too far away (must be really close) and there’s no decoupling capacitor at input

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s